First Adopted: July 20, 2011
Most Recently Effective: July 18, 2019
Rule 2 | Canon 2 | A Judge Shall Perform the Duties of Judicial Office Impartially, Competently, and Diligently
2- 2. 3 | Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment
(A) A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office without bias or prejudice.
(B) A judge shall not, in the performance of judicial duties, by words or conduct manifest bias or prejudice, or engage in harassment, including but not limited to bias, prejudice, or harassment based upon race, sex, gender, gender identity, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, or marital status, and shall not permit court staff, court officials, or others subject to the judge’s direction and control to do so.
(C) A judge shall require lawyers in proceedings before the court to refrain from manifesting bias or prejudice, or engaging in harassment, including but not limited to race, sex, gender, gender identity, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, or marital status, against parties, witnesses, lawyers, or others.
(D) The restrictions of paragraphs (B) and (C), do not preclude judges or lawyers from making legitimate reference to personal factors or characteristics, when they are relevant to an issue in a proceeding.
Comment
[1] A judge who manifests bias or prejudice, or engages in harassment, in a proceeding impairs the fairness of the proceeding and brings the judiciary into disrepute.
[2] Whether a judge's conduct violates Rule 2-2.3 can be determined only by a review of all the circumstances; e.g., the gravity of the acts and whether the acts are part of a pattern of prohibited conduct. For purposes of Rule 2-2.3, "manifests bias or prejudice" means the use of words or conduct that the judge knew or should have known discriminate against, threaten, intimidate, or denigrate any individual or group. Examples of manifestations of bias or prejudice include, but are not limited to, epithets; slurs; demeaning nicknames; negative stereotyping; attempted humor based upon stereotypes; threatening, intimidating, or hostile acts; suggestions of connections between race, ethnicity, or nationality and crime; and irrelevant references to personal characteristics. Even facial expressions and body language can convey to parties and lawyers in the proceeding, jurors, the media, and others an appearance of bias or prejudice. A judge must avoid conduct that may reasonably be perceived as prejudiced or biased.
[3] Harassment, as referred to in paragraphs (B) and (C), is verbal or physical conduct that shows hostility or aversion toward a person based upon race, sex, gender, gender identity, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, or marital status. "Harassment" includes, but is not limited to, unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature when:
(a) Submission to that conduct is made, either explicitly or implicitly, a term or condition of the individual's employment;
(b) Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as a factor in decisions affecting such individual; or
(c) Such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or of creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment.
(Adopted July 20, 2011, effective January 1, 2012. Amended November 10, 2015, effective January 1, 2016; amended July 18, 2019, effective July 18, 2019.)